Page 105 - 2021 Taiwan Food and Drug Administration Annual Report

Numbering Project name Results

I. Inspected: 203 companies

(I) GHP: 105 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline,

of which 103 companies passed the re-inspection and 2 companies did not

pass the re-inspection.

(II) Registration: 30 companies were not applicable, 31 companies were required

Random Inspection to make improvements within a deadline and all of them passed the re-

21 Project for Eastern inspection.
and Western Style (III)Product liability insurance: 65 companies were not applicable and the

Breakfast and Brunch remaining 138 companies were in compliance with the regulations.

(IV)Retain the source documents: 22 companies were required to make

corrections within a deadline, all of which had passed the re-inspection.

(V)Others: 1 company stored expired food.

II. On-site labeling: 203 companies, all were in compliance with the regulations.

III.Random inspection: 194 cases, of which 3 cases did not meet the regulations.

I. Inspected: 159 companies

(I) GHP: 75 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline

and all of them passed the re-inspection.

(II) Registration: 28 companies were required improvement within a deadline,

and all of them had passed the re-inspection.

(III)Product liability insurance: 27 companies were not applicable and the

remaining 132 companies were in compliance with the regulations.

22 Inspection Project for (IV)Retain the source documents: 23 companies were required to make
Noodles Restaurant corrections within a deadline, all of which had passed the re-inspection.

Operators (V)Others: Incorrect date labeling on packaged food, 1 case
II. On-site labeling: 159 companies

(I) Origin of raw beef: 47 companies were not applicable and the remaining 112

companies were in compliance with the regulations.

(II) Restructured meat products: 154 companies were not applicable, and the

remaining 5 companies were in compliance with the regulations.

,,, *HQHWLFDOO\ PRGL¿HG IRRG UDZ PDWHULDOV FRPSDQLHV ZHUH QRW DSSOLFDEOH

and the remaining 130 companies were in with the regulations.

III.Random inspection: 140 cases, of which 2 cases did not meet the regulations.

I. Inspected: 165 companies

(I) GHP: 77 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline

and all of them passed the re-inspection.

(II) Registration: 1 company was not applicable, 28 companies were required

Inspection Project for to make improvements within a deadline and all of them passed the re-

23 Gourmet Restaurants inspection.
at Local Popular (III)Product liability insurance: 4 companies were not applicable and the

Attractions remaining 161 companies were in compliance with the regulations.

(IV)Other: 3 companies stored expired foods.

II. On-site labeling: Inspected the menus of a total of 13 companies, that supplied

FRG ¿VK DQG FRPSDQLHV RI WKHP ZHUH IDOVH ODEHOLQJ

III.Random inspection: 342 cases, of which 8 cases did not meet the regulations.

I. Food delivery operators: 19 companies

(I) GHP: 16 companies were not applicable, 1 company was required to make

improvement within a deadline, and had passed the re-inspection.

(II) Registration: 1 company was not applicable, 1 company was required to

make improvements within a deadline and has passed the re-inspection.

(III)Standard form contract: 9 companies were not applicable, 3 companies were

required to make improvements within a deadline and all of them passed the

re-inspection.

(IV)Customer complaint handling process: 7 companies were not applicable,

1 company was required to make improvement within a deadline, and had

24 Inspection Project passed the re-inspection.
for Food Delivery II. Food and beverage operators collaborating with food delivery platforms: 474
Platform Operators
companies
(I) GHP: 136 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline

and all of them passed the re-inspection.

(II) Registration: 32 companies were not applicable,42 companies were required

to make improvements within a deadline and all of them passed the re-

inspection.

(III)Product liability insurance: 1 company did not comply with the regulations.

(IV)Standard form contracts of gift vouchers for merchandise or services: A total

of 6 companies provided related services, all of which met the requirements.

(V)Other: 3 companies stored expired foods.

,,, 6HUYLFH VWDႇ RI IRRG GHOLYHU\ SODWIRUP SHRSOH DOO LQ FRPSOLDQFH ZLWK WKH

requirements.

103