Page 108 - 2021 Taiwan Food and Drug Administration Annual Report

Numbering Project name Results

Inspection Project of I.Inspected 560 companies

34 Catering Businesses GHP: 86 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline and
for Providing Lunch all of them passed the re-inspection.

to Schools II.Random inspection: 757 cases, of which 1 case did not meet the regulations.

35 Inspection Project I. Inspected: 192 companies
for Commercially GHP: 6 companies required improvement within deadline, and all of them had
Available Frozen passed the re-inspection.
and Refrigerated
Prepared Foods II. Random inspection: 304 cases
, +HDOWK VWDQGDUG FDVHV RI ZKLFK FDVHV GLG QRW IXO¿OO WKH UHTXLUHPHQWV
(II) Nutrition labeling: 12 cases, of which 5 cases did not meet the regulations.

I. Inspected: 43 companies

(I) GHP: 23 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline

and all of them passed the re-inspection.

(II) Registration: 12 companies were required to make improvements within a

deadline and all of them passed the re-inspection.

(III)Traceability: 27 companies were not applicable, 1 company was required to

make improvements within a deadline and had passed the re-inspection.

(IV)Mandatory inspection: 27 companies were not applicable, 1 company was

required to make improvements within a deadline and had passed the re-

inspection.

Inspection Project (V)Food safety monitoring plan: 27 companies were not applicable, 1 company

36 for Packaged was required to make improvements within a deadline and had passed the
Hotpot Soup Base re-inspection.

Manufacturers (VI)Must trace: 27 companies were not applicable, 2 companies required

improvement within a deadline, and both of them had passed the re-

inspection.

(VII)Waste management: 1 company was not applicable, 10 companies were

required to make improvements within a deadline and all of them passed the

re-inspection.

(VIII)Others:

1. 1 company stored expired foods.

2. 1 company did not have a hygiene inspector.

II. Labeling: 107 cases, of which 8 cases did not meet the regulations.

III.Random inspections: 80 cases, all were in compliance with the regulations.

I. Inspected: 211 companies

(I) GHP: 97 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline,

of which 96 companies passed the re-inspection and 1 company did not pass

the re-inspection.

37 Inspection Project for (II) Product liability insurance: 6 companies were not applicable and 2 companies
Small-Scale Bakeries were not in compliance with the regulations.

With a Storefront (III)Others:
1. 2 companies stored expired foods.

2. Food additives used by 1 of the company did not match the registration

information.

3. 1 company evaded an inspection

II. Random inspection: 372 cases, of which 12 cases did not meet the regulations.

I. Inspected: 61 companies

(I) GHP: 18 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline

38 Inspection Project for and all of them passed the re-inspection.
Food ingredient in (II) Registration: 11 companies were required to make improvements within a
the Baking Industry
deadline and all of them passed the re-inspection.
(III)Other: 4 companies stored expired foods.

II. Labeling: 5 companies did not meet the regulations.

III. Random inspections: 90 cases, all were in compliance with the regulations.

Inspection Project

39 for Commercially I. Labeling: 397 cases, of which 4 cases did not meet the regulations.
Available Children's II. Random inspection: 397 cases, of which 5 cases did not meet the regulations.

Food

Inspection Project for

40 Nuclear Radiation I. Labeling: 350 cases, of which 5 cases did not meet the regulations.
in Japanese Food II. Random inspections: 350 cases, all were in compliance with the regulations.
on the Market and

Labeling Check

106