Page 101 - 2021 Taiwan Food and Drug Administration Annual Report
P. 101
Numbering Project name Results
I. Inspected: 34 companies
(I) GHP: 14 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline
and all of them passed the re-inspection.
(II) HACCP: 21 companies were required to make improvements within a
deadline and all of them passed the re-inspection.
(III) Registration: 8 companies were required to make improvements within a
deadline and all of them passed the re-inspection.
(IV) Traceability: 4 companies were required to make improvements within a
4 HACCP Inspection deadline and all of them passed the re-inspection.
Project for an Edible (V) Electronic declaration: 5 companies were required to make improvements
Oil Factory within a deadline and all of them passed the re-inspection.
(VI) Mandatory inspection: 31 companies were not applicable and the remaining
3 companies were in compliance with the regulations.
(VII) Food safety monitoring plan: 31 companies were not applicable and the
remaining 3 companies were in compliance with regulations.
(VIII) Others: 5 companies did not have a hygiene inspector.
II. Labeling: 81 cases, all products were in compliance with regulations.
III. Random inspection: 57 cases, all were in compliance with the regulations. 5
cases of edible oil and fat products for non-HACCP standards were randomly
inspected, and 1 case did not meet the requirements.
I. Inspected: 54 companies
(I) GHP: 16 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline
and all of them passed the re-inspection.
(II) HACCP: 30 companies were required to make improvements within a
deadline and all of them passed the re-inspection.
(III) Registration: 4 companies were required to make improvements within a
deadline and all of them passed the re-inspection.
(IV) Traceability: 44 were not applicable, 2 companies were required to make
improvements within a deadline and both of them passed the re-inspection.
HACCP Inspection (V) Electronic declaration: 46 were not applicable, 2 companies were required
5 Project for Canned to make improvements within a deadline and both of them passed the re-
Food Factory inspection.
(VI) Mandatory inspection: 45 companies were not applicable and the remaining
9 companies were in compliance with the regulations.
(VII) Food safety monitoring plan: 46 companies were not applicable and the
remaining 8 companies were in compliance with regulations.
(VIII) Others: 1 company did not have a hygiene inspector.
II. Labeling: 142 cases, of which 1 case was not applicable, and the remaining 141
cases were in compliance with the regulations.
III. Random inspection: 97 cases, of which all were in compliance with the
regulations.
I. Inspected: 36 companies
(I) *+3 FRPSDQLHV ZHUH QRW DSSOLFDEOH FRPSDQ\ ZDV XQTXDOL¿HG
companies were required to make improvements within a deadline and all of
them passed the re-inspection.
(II) Registration: 4 companies were required to make improvements within a
deadline and all of them passed the re-inspection.
(III) Traceability: 18 companies were not applicable and the remaining 18
Audit project for companies were in compliance with the regulations.
domestic source (IV) Mandatory inspection: 17 companies were not applicable and the remaining
providers of health 19 companies were in compliance with the regulations.
6 foods, vitamin tables (V) Food safety monitoring plan: 17 companies were not applicable, 1 company
and capsules and was required to make improvements within a deadline and has passed the re-
specialized nutritious inspection.
foods (VI) Must trace: 18 companies were not applicable, 3 companies required
improvement within a deadline, and all of them had passed the re-inspection.
(VII) Waste management: 4 companies were not applicable, 3 companies were
required to make improvements within a deadline and all of them passed the
re-inspection.
(VIII) Compliance of the registration permit: 60 cases, of which 9 cases did not
meet the regulations.
II. Labeling: 50 cases, of which 2 cases did not meet the regulations.
99
