Page 100 - 2021 Taiwan Food and Drug Administration Annual Report

Table 4 Food Random Inspection Project in 2020

Numbering Project name Results

I. Inspected: 87 companies

(I) GHP: 56 companies were required to make improvement within a deadline,

and all of them had passed the re-inspection.

(II)HACCP: 13 companies were not applicable. 65 companies were required to

make improvements within a deadline, of which 64 companies had passed the

re-inspection and 1 company did not pass the re-inspection.

(III)Registration: 28 companies were required to make improvement within a

deadline, and all of them had passed the re-inspection.

HACCP Inspection (IV)Traceability: 18 were not applicable, 25 companies were required to make

1 Project for Processed improvements within a deadline and all of them passed the re-inspection.

Meat Industry (V)Mandatory inspection: 18 companies were not applicable, 14 companies were

required to make improvements within a deadline and all of them passed the

re-inspection.

(VI)Others:

1.3 companies stored expired foods.

2.5 companies did not have a hygiene inspector.

3.2 companiHV GLG QRW KLUH SURIHVVLRQDO VWDႇ RU WHFKQLFDO SHUVRQQHO

,, 5DQGRP LQVSHFWLRQ FDVHV RI UDZ PHDW DQG FDVHV RI SURFHVVHG ¿QLVKHG

products, all complying with the regulations.

I. Inspected: 69 companies

(I) GHP: 27 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline

and all of them passed the re-inspection.

(II) HACCP: 43 companies were required to make improvements within a

deadline and all of them passed the re-inspection.

(III) Registration: 11 companies were required to make improvements within a

deadline and all of them passed the re-inspection.

(IV) Traceability: 8 companies were not applicable. 4 companies were required to

make improvements within a deadline, of which 3 companies had passed the

re-inspection and 1 company did not pass the re-inspection.

2 HACCP Inspection (V) Electronic declaration: 8 companies were not applicable, 8 companies were
Project for Aquatic required to make improvements within a deadline and all of them passed the
Processed Food re-inspection.

(VI) Mandatory inspection: 30 companies were not applicable, 9 companies were

required to make improvements within a deadline and all of them passed the

re-inspection.

(VII) Food safety monitoring plan: 49 companies were not applicable and the

remaining 20 companies were in compliance with regulations.

(VIII) Others:

1.1 company stored expired foods.

2.5 companies did not have a hygiene inspector.

3.1 coPSDQ\ GLG QRW KLUH SURIHVVLRQDO VWDႇ RU WHFKQLFDO SHUVRQQHO

II. Labeling: 145 cases, of which 7 cases did not meet the regulations.

III. Random inspection: 83 cases, of which 3 cases did not meet the regulations.

I. Inspected: 84 companies

(I) GHP: 2 companies were not applicable, 49 companies were required to make

improvements within a deadline and all of them passed the re-inspection.

(II)HACCP: 5 companies were not applicable. 60 companies were required to

make improvements within a deadline, of which 58 companies had passed the

re-inspection and 2 companies did not pass the re-inspection.

(III)Registration: 2 companies were not applicable, 15 companies were required to

make improvements within a deadline and all of them passed the re-inspection.

(IV)Food safety monitoring plan: 70 were not applicable, 2 companies were

required to make improvements within a deadline and both of them passed the

re-inspection.

HACCP Inspection (V)Traceability: 7 companies were not applicable.23 were required to make

3 Project for Meal Box improvements within a deadline, of which 22 companies had passed the re-

Factory inspection and 1 company did not pass the re-inspection.

(VI)Waste management: 2 companies were not applicable, 11 companies were

required to make improvements within a deadline and all of them passed the

re-inspection.

(VII)Others:

1.5 companies stored expired foods.

2.2 companies did not have a hygiene inspector.

3.5 cRPSDQLHV GLG QRW KLUH SURIHVVLRQDO VWDႇ RU WHFKQLFDO SHUVRQQHO

II. Random inspection: 164 cases

98 (I) Finished products: 82 cases, of which 2 cases did not meet the regulations.
,, 6HPL ¿QLVKHG SURGXFts: 82 cases, of which 2 cases did not meet the

regulations.