Page 102 - 2021 Taiwan Food and Drug Administration Annual Report

Numbering Project name Results

I. Inspected: 25 companies

(I) GHP: 4 companies were not applicable, 7 companies were required to make

improvements within a deadline and all of them passed the re-inspection.

(II) Registration: 13 companies were required to make improvements within a

deadline and all of them passed the re-inspection.

(III) Traceability: 1 company was not applicable, 2 companies were required

7 Inspection Project to make improvements within a deadline and both of them passed the re-
for Food Additive inspection.
Manufacturers and (IV) Electronic declaration: 1 company was not applicable, 2 companies were
Import Businesses required to make improvements within a deadline and both of them passed
the re-inspection.

(V) Mandatory inspection: 1 company was not applicable and the remaining 24

companies were in compliance with the regulations.

(VI) Food safety monitoring plan: 9 companies were not applicable and the

remaining 16 companies were in compliance with regulations.

II. Labeling: 44 cases, all were in compliance with the regulations.

III. Random inspections: 24 cases, all were in compliance with the regulations.

I. Inspected: 110 companies

(I) GHP: 60 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline,

of which 59 companies passed the re-inspection and 1 company did not pass

the re-inspection.

(II) Registration: 28 companies required to make improvement within a deadline,

and all of them had passed the re-inspection.

8 Inspection Project for (III) Traceability: 108 companies were not applicable and the remaining 2
Small-Scale Aquatic companies were in compliance with the regulations.

Product, Dairy (IV) Electronic declaration: 108 companies were not applicable and remaining 2
Product Processing companies were in compliance with the regulations.
and Canned Food
(V) Mandatory inspection: 107 companies were not applicable, 1 company was
Manufacturers required to make improvements within a deadline and had passed the re-
inspection.

(VI) Food safety monitoring plan: None of the 110 companies were applicable.

(VII)Others: 1 company did not have a hygiene inspector.

II. Labeling: 122 cases, of which 7 cases did not meet the regulations.

III. Random sampling inspection: 92 cases, and the 13 cases (sales) for random

inspection were not part of the project inspection, all of which comply with the

regulations.

I. Inspected: 50 companies

(I) GHP: 22 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline

and all of them passed the re-inspection.

(II) HACCP: 28 companies were not applicable, 16 companies were required

to make improvements within a deadline and all of them passed the re-

inspection.

(III) Registration: 10 companies were required to make improvements within a

deadline and all of them passed the re-inspection.

Inspection project (IV) Traceability: 44 companies were not applicable and the remaining 6

9 for liquid egg companies were in compliance with the regulations.

manufacturers (V) Electronic declaration: 44 companies were not applicable, 2 companies were

required to make improvements within a deadline and both of them passed

the re-inspection.

(VI) Others:

1. 1 company stored expired foods.

2. 4 companies did not have hygiene inspector.

II. Random inspection: 178 cases

(I) Fresh raw materials: 52 cases, all comply with the regulations.

(II) Liquid egg ¿QLVKHG SURGXFWV FDVHV DOO FRPSO\ ZLWK WKH UHJXODWLRQV

I. Inspected: 32 companies

(I) GHP: 13 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline

and all of them passed the re-inspection.

(II) HACCP: 3 companies were not applicable. 6 companies were required to

make improvements within a deadline, of which 5 companies had passed the

re-inspection and 1 company did not pass the re-inspection.

10 Inspection Project (III)Registration: 1 company was not applicable, 1 company was required to make
for Preserved Eggs improvements within a deadline and had passed the re-inspection.

and Salted Eggs (IV)Retain the source documents: 4 companies were required to make corrections
Manufacturers within a deadline, all of which had passed the re-inspection.

(V) Vacuum packaging food labeling inspection: 23 companies were not

applicable and the remaining 9 companies were in compliance with

regulations.

100 II. Random inspection: 76 cases

(I) Fresh raw materials: 25 cases, all comply with the regulations.

(II) Finished products (preserved eggs, salted eggs/salted egg yolks, wine eggs):
51 cases, all of which comply with the regulations.