Page 110 - 2020Taiwan Food and Drug Administration Annual Report

/VNCFSJOH 1SPKFDU OBNF 3FTVMU
I.Inspected: 280 companies
(I) GHP: 87 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline, of which 86
companies passed the re-inspection and 1 company is no longer in business.
(II) Registration: 21 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline and all of
Inspections Project for them passed the re-inspection.
28 Food Businesses in the (III) Product liability insurance: 7 companies are not applicable and all the others are in compliance
Food Court
with the regulations.
(IV) Labeling at food and drink places: 1 company did not meet the regulations.
(V) Others: 3 companies stored expired products.
II.Random inspection: 108 cases, of which all are in compliance with the regulations.
Inspected:
I. Manufacturer: 26 manufacturers
Inspection Project for (I) GHP: 2 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline and all of them
Food Utensils, Food passed the re-inspection.
29 Containers or Package (II) Registration: All are in compliance with the regulations.
Containing Plastic and in (III) Random inspection: 52 cases, of which all are in compliance with the regulations.
Contact with Food II. Retail business:
(I) Labeling: 211 cases, of which 8 cases did not meet the regulations.
(II) Random inspection: 53 cases, of which 1 case did not meet the regulations.
Inspected: 143 companies
I. GHP: 28 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline and all of them passed
Inspection Project for the re-inspection.
30 the Food Logistics and II. Registration: 10 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline and all of them
Storage Industry
passed the re-inspection.
III.Others: 3 companies stored expired products.
Inspection on online order food manufacturers for Chinese New Year
I. Inspected: 57 companies
(I) GHP: 37 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline and all of them
passed the re-inspection.
(II) Registration: 18 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline and all of
them passed the re-inspection.
(III) Standard form contract: 13 companies are not applicable, 22 companies were required to
make improvements within a deadline and all of them passed the re-inspection.
(IV) Product liability insurance: 2 companies are not applicable and 4 companies are not in
compliance with the regulations.
(V) Use and management of food additives: 25 are not applicable, 16 companies were required to
make improvements within a deadline and all of them passed the re-inspection.
(VI) Waste management: 3 companies are not applicable, 9 companies were required to make
improvements within a deadline and all of them passed the re-inspection.
(VII) Others: 2 companies stored expired products.
II. Random inspection: 166 cases, of which 2 cases do not meet the regulations.
III.Labeling: 145 cases, of which 6 cases did not meet the regulations.
Random inspection for food sold during the Chinese New Year holidays
I. Inspected: 505 companies
Inspection Project for
31 (I) GHP: 11 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline and all of them
Chinese New Year
passed the re-inspection.
(II) Registration: 11 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline and all of
them passed the re-inspection.
II. Random inspection: 1,894 cases, of which 31 cases do not meet the regulations.
III.Labeling: 1,743 cases, of which 4 cases do not meet the regulations.
Random inspection for food served in the restaurants during the Chinese New Year holidays
I. Inspected: 54 companies
(I) GHP: 25 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline and all of them
passed the re-inspection.
(II) Registration: 7 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline and all of
them passed the re-inspection.
(III) Product liability insurance: all of them are in compliance with the regulations.
(IV) Standard form contract: 8 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline
and all of them passed the re-inspection.
(V) Others:
1. 3 companies used expired ingredients.
2. 1 company did not hire professional staff or technical personnel.
II. On-site labeling: 2 companies do not meet the regulations.
III.Random inspection: 61 cases, all are in compliance with the regulations.

108