Page 104 - 2020Taiwan Food and Drug Administration Annual Report

Table 4c 2019 Food Random Inspection Project
T able 4

/VNCFSJOH 1SPKFDU OBNF 3FTVMU
I. Inspected: 155 companies
(I) GHP: 86 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline, of which 85
passed the re-inspection and 1 did not pass the re-inspection.
(II) HACCP: 105 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline and all of
them passed the re-inspection.
(III) Registration: 21 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline and all of
them passed the re-inspection.
HACCP Inspection Project (IV) Tracing and tracking: 26 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline
1 for Processed Meat and all of them passed the re-inspection.
Industry
(V) Mandatory inspection: 17 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline
and all of them passed the re-inspection.
(VI) Others:
1.3 companies stored expired food and food additives.
2.5 companies did not hire professional staff or technical personnel.
3.4 companies did not have hygiene inspector.
II.Random inspection: 320 cases, all comply with the regulations.
I. Inspected: 12 companies
(I) GHP: 8 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline and all of them
passed the re-inspection.
(II) HACCP: 9 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline and all of them
passed the re-inspection.
(III) Registration: 1 company was required to make improvements within a deadline and it passed
HACCP Inspection Project the re-inspection.
2 for Dairy Processing (IV) Mandatory inspection: 7 companies passed the inspection and 5 companies are not applicable.
Industry (V) Food safety monitoring plan: 5 companies passed the inspection and 7 companies are not
applicable.
(VI) Tracing and tracking: All are in compliance with the regulations.
(VII) Electronic declaration required to be traced: 1 company was required to make improvements
within a deadline and it passed the re-inspection.
II.Labeling: 29 cases, of which 1 case does not meet the regulations.
III.Random inspection: 19 cases, all are in compliance with the regulations.
I. Inspected: 104 companies
(I) GHP: 48 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline and all of them
passed the re-inspection.
(II) HACCP: 77 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline, of which 76
had passed the re-inspection and 1 did not pass the re-inspection.
(III) Registration: 11 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline and all of
them passed the re-inspection.
(IV) Mandatory inspection: 27 are not applicable, 7 companies were required to make
improvements within a deadline and all of them passed the re-inspection.
HACCP Audit Project for
3 (V) Food safety monitoring plan: 72 are not applicable, 1 company was required to make
Aquatic Food Industry
improvements within a deadline and all of them passed the re-inspection.
(VI) Tracing and tracking: 20 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline
and all of them passed the re-inspection.
(VII) Others:
1.1 company stored expired products.
2.1 company did not hire professional staff or technical personnel.
3.3 companies did not have a hygiene inspector.
II.Labeling: 225 cases, of which 3 cases do not meet the regulations.
III.Random inspection: 97 cases, all are in compliance with the regulations.
I. Inspected: 86 companies
(I) GHP: 45 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline and all of them
passed the re-inspection.
(II) HACCP: 67 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline and 1 of them
did not pass the re-inspection.
(III) Registration: 6 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline and all of
them passed the re-inspection.
HACCP Inspection Project (IV) Must trace: 11 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline and all of
4
for Meal Box Factory them passed the re-inspection.
9 :DVWH ÀRZ FRPSDQLHV ZHUH UHTXLUHG WR PDNH LPSURYHPHQWV ZLWKLQ D GHDGOLQH DQG DOO RI
them passed the re-inspection.
(VI) Others:
1.2 companies used expired ingredients.
2.2 companies did not hire professional staff or technical personnel.
3.1 company did not have a hygiene inspector.
102 4.The outer package label of 1 company does not meet the regulations.