Page 126 - 2023 Taiwan Food and Drug Administration Annual Report

2023 Taiwan Food and
Drug Administration

Annual Report

Numbering Project name Results

Random Inspection for Chinese New Year Market and Popular Foods Vendors
I. Inspected: 317 companies

(I) GHP: 12 companies were asked to correct by a given deadline and all were
qualified through the re-inspections.

(II) Food business registration: 6 companies were not applicable, 13 companies
were asked to correct by a given deadline and all were qualified through the re-
inspections.

(III)Retention of source documents: 3 companies were asked to correct by a given
deadline and all were qualified through the re-inspections.

II. Labeling: 1 case out of 1,124 cases did not meet requirements.
III.Random inspection: 10 cases out of 1,449 cases did not meet requirements.

Random inspection for New Year's dish restaurant

I. Inspected: 55 companies

(I) GHP: 30 companies were asked to correct by a given deadline and were qualified

through the re-inspections.

(II) Food business registration: 13 companies were asked to correct by a given

deadline and all were qualified through the re-inspections.

(III)Retention of source documents: 7 companies were asked to correct by a given

deadline and all were qualified through the re-inspections.

(IV)Product liability insurance: All 55 companies met requirements.

(V)Standard form contract:

1.Information shown in gift certificates: 50 companies were not applicable and 1

company was asked to correct by a given deadline and was qualified through

the re-inspections.

2.Contents of standard form contracts concluded through correspondence for

food or catering service: 46 companies were not applicable and 2 companies

34 Inspection Project for were asked to correct by a given deadline and were qualified through the re-
Chinese New Year inspections.
(VI)Others: 3 companies stored expired foods.

II. On-site labeling: 4 companies out of 55 companies did not meet requirements.

III.Random inspections: None out of 108 cases was found with non-conformity.

Inspection of Food Manufacturers for Chinese New Year foods
I. Inspected: 45 companies

(I) GHP: 22 companies were asked to correct by a given deadline and all were
qualified through the re-inspection.

(II) Food business registration: 7 companies were asked to correct by a given
deadline and all were qualified through the re-inspections.

(III) Use and management of food additives: 8 companies were not applicable, 10
companies were asked to correct by a given deadline and all were qualified
through the re-inspections.

(IV) Retention of source documents: 2 companies were asked to correct by a given
deadline and all were qualified through the re-inspections.

(V) Waste management: 11 companies were asked to correct by a given deadline
and were all qualified through the re-inspections.

(VI) Product liability insurance: 1 company were not applicable and remaining 44
companies were qualified.

(VII) Standard form contract: 14 companies were not applicable, 10 companies
were asked to correct by a given deadline and all were qualified through the re-
inspections.

(VIII) Transportation vehicle hygiene management: 23 companies were not
applicable and 1 company was asked to correct by a given deadline and was
qualified through the re-inspections.

(IX) Others: 2 companies stored expired foods.
II. Labeling: 3 cases out of 132 cases did not meet requirements.
III.Random inspection: 2 cases out of 132 cases did not meet requirements.

124