Page 125 - 2023 Taiwan Food and Drug Administration Annual Report

7Appendix

Numbering Project name Results

I. Inspected: 319 companies

(I) GHP: 154 companies were asked to correct by a given deadline and 1 company of

them failed the re-inspections.

(II) Food business registration: 14 companies were not applicable, 26 companies

30 Random Inspection were asked to correct by a given deadline and all were qualified through the re-
Project for Breakfast inspections.
(III) Retention of source documents: 24 companies were asked to correct by a given
and Brunch deadline and all were qualified through the re-inspections.
Businesses (IV) Product liability insurance: 69 companies were not applicable and 1 company did

not meet requirements.

(V) Others: 1 company stored expired foods.

II. On-site labeling: All 319 companies met requirements.

III.Random inspection: 1 case out of 298 cases did not meet requirements.

I. Inspected: 4 companies

31 Inspection project for II.Labeling:
multilevel marketing (I) Food Labeling: 4 cases out of 23 cases did not meet requirements.
(II) Cosmetics Labeling: All 21 cases met requirements.
businesses
III.Field advertisement promotional leaflets: None out of 7 cases was found with non-

conformity.

I. Inspected: 168 companies
Inspection Project for GHP: 32 companies were asked to correct by a given deadline and all were qualified
32 the Food Logistics through the re-inspections.
and Storage Industry II.Food business registration: 6 companies were not applicable, 13 companies were

asked to correct by a given deadline and all were qualified through the re-inspections.

I. Inspected:

(I) Manufacturers: 25 companies

Inspection Project 1.GHP: 6 companies were asked to correct by a given deadline and were

for Food Utensils, qualified through the re-inspection.

33 Food Containers or 2.Food business registration: 7 companies were asked to correct by a given
Package Containing deadline and all were qualified through the re-inspections.

Plastic and in Contact 3.Labeling: 1 case out of 48 cases did not meet requirements.

with Food (II) Distribution, catering:

1.Labeling: 2 cases out of 173 cases did not meet requirements.

2.Random inspections: None out of 26 cases was found with non-conformity.

123