Page 118 - 2023 Taiwan Food and Drug Administration Annual Report
P. 118
2023 Taiwan Food and
Drug Administration
Annual Report
Numbering Project name Results
I. Inspected: 58 companies
(I) GHP: 24 companies were required to make improvements within a deadline and 1
company failed the re-inspection.
(II) Food business registration: 9 companies were asked to correct by a given
deadline and all were qualified through the re-inspections.
(III) Mandatory inspection: 48 companies were not applicable, 1 company was asked
to correct by a given deadline and was qualified through the re-inspections.
(IV) Use and management of food additives: 34 companies were not applicable, 7
companies were asked to correct by a given deadline and 1 company failed the
re-inspections.
(V) Traceability: 48 companies were not applicable and all the remaining 10
companies were qualified.
(VI) Food safety monitoring plan: 48 companies were not applicable and the
6 Inspection Project for remaining 10 companies were all qualified.
Chocolate Products (VII) Food Traceability Management Information System: 48 companies were not
Manufacturers applicable, 1 company was asked to correct by a given deadline and was
qualified through the re-inspections.
(VIII) Waste management: 11 companies were asked to correct by a given deadline
and were all qualified through the re-inspections.
(IX) Product liability insurance: 1 company did not meet requirements.
(X) Standard form contract: 21 companies were not applicable, 17 companies
were asked to correct by a given deadline and all were qualified through the re-
inspections.
(XI) Others:
1.3 companies stored expired foods.
2.1 company was found to have purchased chocolate transfer sheets from other
countries online instead of going through inspections upon importation as
required.
II. Labeling: 6 cases out of 478 cases did not meet requirements.
III. Random inspection: 1 case out of 92 cases did not meet requirements.
I. Inspected: 45 companies
(I) GHP: 24 companies were asked to correct by a given deadline and all were
qualified through the re-inspections.
(II) HACCP: 40 companies were not applicable, 3 companies were asked to correct
by a given deadline, and 1 company failed the re-inspections.
(III) Food business registration: 12 companies were asked to correct by a given
deadline and all were qualified through the re-inspections.
(IV) Mandatory inspection: 42 companies were not applicable and the remaining 3
Inspection project for companies were qualified.
7 Edible Oil and Fat (V) Traceability: 29 companies were not applicable, 6 companies were asked to
Manufacturing correct by a given deadline, and all of them were qualified through the re-
inspections.
(VI) Electronic declaration: 29 companies were not applicable, 6 companies were
asked to correct by a given deadline and all were qualified through the re-
inspections.
(VII) Food safety monitoring plan: 42 companies were not applicable and the
remaining 3 companies were all qualified.
II. Labeling: 9 cases out of 74 cases did not meet requirements.
III.Random inspection: All 79 cases met requirements.
116
